David Simon and the death of newspapers

Esquire magazine long since slid into irrelevancy, but David Simon’s article in the March edition (and online) could practically double as my manifesto:

At the very edge of being rendered irrelevant by the arrival of the Internet — at the precise moment when their very product would be threatened by technology — newspapers will not be intent on increasing and deepening their coverage of their cities, their nation, the world. They will be instead in the hands of out-of-town moneymen offering unfeeling and unequivocal fealty to stockholders and the share price.

And more, which is what I observed from Corporate newspapers in at least two of my hometowns:

I don’t yet see it as a zero-sum game in which a serious newspaper would cover less and less of its city … and favor instead a handful of special select projects designed to catch the admiring gaze of a prize committee.

… Or worse, to try to fool readers into thinking we would actually, you know, “cover” your community. Instead they’d offer these tiny little neighborhood pages and throw out a local blow-out package once a year “filled with the hope that more people will subscribe to a newspaper that manages now and then to run a photo of someone’s kid at the county fair” — as Simon said in the Washington Post about a failed zoned insert from the Baltimore Sun but applicable to my old haunt — and then go back to ignoring you on a daily basis — since it was, um, a daily paper.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: